RE: RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance

That's right - and those mechanisms by which the URI remains anonymous
and temporary and access rights to the anonymous form of the location
are controlled are quite extensive considerations.

I understand the conveyance draft just says how to get the location
object and/or reference from one signaling peer to another. It's asking
to much of this specification to anticipate all the possible mechanisms
for applying security to privacy in the by-reference form and thereby
restricting the form of the reference to a particular protocol. This
should be out of scope for the conveyance protocol.

Cheers,
Martin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeroen van Bemmel [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 July 2006 4:46 PM
> To: Brian Rosen; 'Marc Linsner'; Peterson, Jon; 'Andrew Newton';
Rosen,
> Brian
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-
> conveyance
> 
> >I don't really understand why you think location by reference is so
much
> of
> > a concern.
> 
> Because location by reference involves storage of personal information
on
> a
> server. That suddenly makes all sorts of regulations apply, the points
I
> mentioned address only a small part of that. Having an anonymous URL
for
> example often makes a difference, because then the information is no
> longer
> directly linked to a particular person.
> 
> When an endpoint inserts location by value, you can reasonably argue
that
> opt-in consent requirements (which many countries have) are fulfilled,
> provided the endpoint gives the user control over whether or not
location
> is
> inserted. Same holds for the endpoint inserting a flag asking a proxy
to
> fill in the location (by value).
> For location-by-reference this is much more fuzzy. You probably don't
need
> a
> lecture on privacy regulations, but e.g.
> http://www.isoc.org/briefings/015/index.shtml (from 2003 but still
> applicable IMO) illustrates the mess.
> 
> A while ago I submitted a draft on Temporarily Routable User Agent
URIs
> (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jbemmel-sip-truu-02.txt),
which
> provides anonymous, temporary URIs that can be explicitly invalidated.
You
> may want to consider something similar for location-by-reference
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jeroen
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip