RE: RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance

Jeroen Van Bemmel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Yes,mine too, with one additional remark: the location based routing use case should be removed

It is a special case of a more general one: route to some party in area X. This need not have anything to do with the caller's location, in fact for privacy reasons it is better not.

LBR is better handled using caller prefs/callee capabilities (eg define +geo.zip, not using PIDF at all for simplicity)

Given the above, proxy removal of location and data URIs are less of an issue

Regards,
Jeroen

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: "Stark, Barbara" <[email protected]>
Aan: "Henning Schulzrinne" <[email protected]>; "Brian Rosen" <[email protected]>
CC: "IETF SIP List" <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Verzonden: 27-7-06 22:02
Onderwerp: RE: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance

This gets my vote.
Barbara

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henning Schulzrinne [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 11:25 PM
> To: Brian Rosen
> Cc: IETF SIP List; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to
> location-conveyance
> 
> 
> My suggestion would be
> 
> - to focus the draft on just defining the Location header syntax,  
> without ruling out any particular mechanism or scheme; this would  
> make the draft really short (which I would find helpful).
> 
> - and then add one section to the draft that prototypically defines  
> what a particular scheme that wants to appear in the Location header  
> needs to define, using the non-controversial cid mechanism as the  
> example. Other, separate, drafts can then define other modes,  
> following the same template. Documents such as the phone-bcp 
> can then  
> pick some suitable must-implement subset and make emergency-call- 
> specific recommendations, rather than sprinkling these 


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.