Re: RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> LBR is better handled using caller prefs/callee capabilities (eg > define +geo.zip, not using PIDF at all for simplicity) > This is completely new suggestion; emergency calling is nothing but a special case of location-based routing. I agree that it is useful to separate location information for routing from that shown to end systems, as they often have different resolution needs. (To route to the right branch of your pizza delivery franchiser, you may only need a zip code, but for delivery, you need the full street address. The practical problem is that such boundaries don't always agree with zip codes or any other higher-level geographic unit, such as state, county or town.) Henning _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip