Re: [Geopriv] rethinking data:
"James M. Polk" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 04:08 PM 8/25/2006 -0400, Andrew Newton wrote: >Having reviewed the archives Andy Which archives did you review? There were several voices opposed to it, but maybe not on the Geopriv list. After all, this is a SIP doc... >on the recent location conveyance discussion, I see that I was the only >one to raise an objection to the use of a data: URL in the Location header. > >My objection was based on the fact that it would add unnecessary >complexity. Given some more time to think this through, I believe it adds >no more complexity than the alternative... even much less complexity than >the alternatives especially if there is no desire to specify its use with >XML D-Sig. Of course, the use of this mechanism MUST be restricted >specifically to emergency scenarios, and only when location is not present >in the body. > >-andy > > >_______________________________________________ >Geopriv mailing list >[email protected] >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip