Re: [Geopriv] rethinking data:

Andrew Newton <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Aug 25, 2006, at 6:01 PM, James M. Polk wrote:

> At 04:08 PM 8/25/2006 -0400, Andrew Newton wrote:
>> Having reviewed the archives
>
> Andy
>
> Which archives did you review?
>
> There were several voices opposed to it, but maybe not on the  
> Geopriv list.  After all, this is a SIP doc...

I'm well aware of that fact, James.  However, there was actually very  
little significant discussion on it besides the exchange between  
Henning and myself (there was a post on the SIP list that never made  
it to GEOPRIV that was in favor).  Keep in mind, this was mixed into  
a long and winding thread.

So, here we have another thread.  And it would be easy for those  
opposed (or for) to stand up and be counted (and offer an  
explanation, too... after all, we don't vote in the IETF).

-andy

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.