Re: A review of draft-ietf-hip-dex-02.txt

Hi,

On 05/16/2016 06:50 PM, René Hummen wrote:
> Hi Miika, all,
>
> thanks for reviewing the draft!

my pleasure. I am ok with your changes, just a small note below.

>      > 2.1.  Requirements Terminology
>
>     In section 6.3, you are introduce also -> notation, which was
>     not explained.
>
>
> I didn't think an explanation of this formal notation was necessary as
> it is also not further described, e.g., in RFC5869. What would you like
> me to write here?

I should probably read RFC5869 before I can understand how to implement 
the key derivation for DEX. It was a bit difficult to follow what is the 
input and especially what is the resulting output.

The reference for RFC5869 is missing?

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec