RE: FW: EPON MIB comments

"Lior khermosh" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.hubmib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
My comments are in the text.

-----Original Message-----
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 3:42 AM
To: Matt Squire; [email protected]; Lior khermosh;
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [Hubmib] FW: EPON MIB comments


> > > >    eponDeviceTemperatureEventIndicationState
> > > >    eponDeviceTemperatureEventIndicationEnabled
> > > >    eponDevicePowerVoltageEventIndicationState
> > > >    eponDevicePowerVoltageEventIndicationEnabled
> 
> Where are these objects reflected in the management clause of
> 802.3ah?  I'm not a fan of adding new things at this stage of 
> the game.  Temp and voltage measurements and events aren't 
> generally within the purview of 802.3.   
> 

I agree with Glen and Matt, although reflecting the objects from the
management clause of 802.3ah is not a requirement. I made the comment at
IETF-59 that RFC 3433 (Entity Sensor MIB) would be a better solution for
temperature and voltage indication. 

[Lior] Dan. Thanks for the detailed comment. I will verify the coverage
and remove the objects from the EPON device MIB and create a reference
instead.


Regards,

Dan
(speaking as contributor)

  
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.