RE: FW: EPON MIB comments

"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.hubmib
Message-ID <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F06E3082F@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Squire [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Another example is alarm related attributes:
> > > >    eponDeviceDyingGaspAlarmState
> > > >    eponDeviceDyingGaspAlarmEnabled
> > > >    eponDeviceCriticalEventState
> > > >    eponDeviceCriticalEventEnabled
> > > >    eponDeviceLocalLinkFaultAlarmState
> > > >    eponDeviceLocalLinkFaultAlarmEnabled
> 
> In the first revision of the OAM MIB, these states were 
> directly reflected.  In the -02 revision, all event 
> information was shoved into a new "EventLog" table.  So 
> transition in these are flags are reflected there.  I can add 
> them back as separate objects, I just don't want to go back 
> and forth.  In the transition to the -02 version, the 
> enable/disable of the events reflected in flags was 
> <stupidly> removed.  Can add that back as removing it was 
> unintentional.  

unintentional - maybe
stupid - I am not so sure :-)

The Alarm MIB (RFC 3877) can be used to define the alarms, their severity status, and also defines a log. We can consider using it, the balance being between the overhead of supporting the full Alarm MIB vs. the benefit of avoiding duplication.

Regards,

Dan


>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.