RE: FW: EPON MIB comments
"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.hubmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F06E3082F@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Squire [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Another example is alarm related attributes: > > > > eponDeviceDyingGaspAlarmState > > > > eponDeviceDyingGaspAlarmEnabled > > > > eponDeviceCriticalEventState > > > > eponDeviceCriticalEventEnabled > > > > eponDeviceLocalLinkFaultAlarmState > > > > eponDeviceLocalLinkFaultAlarmEnabled > > In the first revision of the OAM MIB, these states were > directly reflected. In the -02 revision, all event > information was shoved into a new "EventLog" table. So > transition in these are flags are reflected there. I can add > them back as separate objects, I just don't want to go back > and forth. In the transition to the -02 version, the > enable/disable of the events reflected in flags was > <stupidly> removed. Can add that back as removing it was > unintentional. unintentional - maybe stupid - I am not so sure :-) The Alarm MIB (RFC 3877) can be used to define the alarms, their severity status, and also defines a log. We can consider using it, the balance being between the overhead of supporting the full Alarm MIB vs. the benefit of avoiding duplication. Regards, Dan >