RE: WGLC for: draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib-06.txt

"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]> Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:24:22 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.hubmib
Message-ID <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F0BA12E1D@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
Section 3.1.3 refers to 'SNMP agent' and Table 2 has a columns named
'SNMP objects. In reality this document defines SMIv2 MIB modules that
could be used in theory with other protocols, not only with SNMP. I
would suggest more neutral terminology to be used ('management agent',
'SMIv2 objects'). 

Dan


 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 5:12 PM
> To: Hubmib Mailing List (E-mail)
> Subject: [Hubmib] WGLC for: draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib-06.txt
> 
> [bcc to adslmib wg. Pls comment on the hubmib WG mailing list.
>  if needed, the adslmib wg chairs can collect and summarize  
> comments as well and then post it to the HUBMIB WG list.]
> 
> This is a formal WG Last Call for
>   
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-m
> ib-06.txt
> 
> WG LC ends on October 31st, any timezone.
> 
> Following WGLC of revision 05, a set of changes was required, 
> including moving the ifAvailableStackTable to a distinct MIB 
> module (say IF-AVAILABLE-STACK-MIB, seating directly under
> MIB-2) and adding an inverse table ifInvAvailableStackTable, 
> which would allow the ADSL MIB WG to refer and re-use them. 
> I suggested that after a revised I-D is available the WG 
> would do a fast track LC to approve the changes. 
> 
> Revision 6 was posted on Oct 12th to address the above.
> 
> Bert
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hubmib mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib
>