Re: Can one Destination Address appear in both Tunnel Encap Attribute and in MP_REACH_NLRI ?
Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Oct 2019 22:15:09 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOj+MME7QnYOiRA276UghkJvBwhK4r9mudNxuJruwrtYP-2spw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Linda, Yes your interpretation is correct. Thx R. On Tue, Oct 22, 2019, 16:25 Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> wrote: > Srihari and Robert, > > > > Thank you very much for the discussion. > > > > Your explanation indicates that the tunnel information described in Tunnel > Path Attributes are applicable to all the NLRI listed in the MP-NLRI Path > Attributes, correct? > > For example, D1/D2/D3/D4 all have R2 as Next Hop, and R2 supports GRE and > VxLAN. The Update from R2 will have D1, D2, D3, D4 listed in the MP-NLRI > (code= 14), and GRE tunnel & VxLAN tunnel listed under the Tunnel Attribute > (code = 23). > > > > When R1 receives the UPDATE from R2, R1 can assume that packets to D1, D2, > D3, D4 can use either VxLAN or GRE. Is it correct? > > > > So if R2 needs to specifically indicate GRE for D1, VxLAN for D2, D3, and > IPinIP for D4, then R2 needs to send 3 separate UPDATE messages. Is it > correct? > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > > > > > *From:* Srihari Sangli <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, October 17, 2019 3:08 AM > *To:* Robert Raszuk <[email protected]>; Srihari Sangli <ssangli= > [email protected]> > *Cc:* Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Idr] Can one Destination Address appear in both Tunnel > Encap Attribute and in MP_REACH_NLRI ? > > > > Hi Robert, > > > > > > > > My reading of Linda's point was a question regarding the case where for > prefix A NLRI points to > > next hop NH_1 but tunnel endpoint says go to NH_2. > > > > Is such update still valid ? > > > > Has tunnel encapsulation attribute power to "overrule" BGP next hop from > MP_REACH ? > > > > > > The draft in Section 5 explains this. If the update has a valid Tunnel > Encapsulation attribute and if any of the tunnel(s) is considered to be > feasible, then it MUST use the tunnel. That means in your example, such an > update is valid and NH_2 should be used. > > > > Hope this helps. Thanks. > > > > srihari⦠> > > > > > _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr