Re: IDs to consider

In a message dated 10/15/2004 10:28:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:


>     draft-baker-tsvwg-mlef-concerns-02.txt
>     draft-baker-tsvwg-mlpp-that-works-02.txt
> 
> The above IDs are not quite in our charter but they are 
> relevant to the ieprep mission - we would like people 
> on the list to review and comment on them with a view 
> to recommending to the IESG that they
> be published as informational RFCs
> 
> 

The first draft is titled "MLEF Without Capacity Admission Does Not Satisfy 
MLPP Requirements" and was written to argue that MLEF, as described in 
draft-silverman-tsvwg-mlefphb-00.txt and its predecesors would not meet the DoD's own 
requirements for MLPP without the use of some form of Capacity Admission 
Control (CAC). The MLEF draft was reissued as version -01 on October 6, partly to 
more strongly emphasize that this proposed mechanism must be used with CAC and 
will fail without it.

Therefore, there is no need for continued discussion/consideration of the 
first draft listed above.

Mike Pierce
Artel