Re: IDs to consider

So maybe we should then also  be discussing
draft-silverman-tsvwg-mlefphb-01.txt?


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
for such purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




                                                                                                                 
                      Mpierce1                                                                                   
                      @aol.com                 To:      [email protected], [email protected]                
                      Sent by:                 cc:                                                               
                      ieprep-bounces           Subject: Re: [Ieprep] IDs to consider                             
                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                 
                      10/19/2004 12:36                                                                           
                      PM                                                                                         
                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                 




In a message dated 10/15/2004 10:28:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:


>     draft-baker-tsvwg-mlef-concerns-02.txt
>     draft-baker-tsvwg-mlpp-that-works-02.txt
>
> The above IDs are not quite in our charter but they are
> relevant to the ieprep mission - we would like people
> on the list to review and comment on them with a view
> to recommending to the IESG that they
> be published as informational RFCs
>
>

The first draft is titled "MLEF Without Capacity Admission Does Not Satisfy

MLPP Requirements" and was written to argue that MLEF, as described in
draft-silverman-tsvwg-mlefphb-00.txt and its predecesors would not meet the
DoD's own
requirements for MLPP without the use of some form of Capacity Admission
Control (CAC). The MLEF draft was reissued as version -01 on October 6,
partly to
more strongly emphasize that this proposed mechanism must be used with CAC
and
will fail without it.

Therefore, there is no need for continued discussion/consideration of the
first draft listed above.

Mike Pierce
Artel


_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep