Re: proposed charter
Janet P Gunn <[email protected]> Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:10:03 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ieprep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF224B2CE0.98EC02F1-ON852571F6.0068F50B-852571F6.00693082@csc.com> |
My understanding (and Martin et al can correct me/clarify): Current discussion is about voice. Video conferencing is actively under consideration Elastic traffic is a long term goal, but not currently being addressed in any detail. Janet Fred Baker <[email protected]> wrote on 09/27/2006 03:05:19 PM: > > On Sep 27, 2006, at 11:44 AM, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > > > Just confirming that Fred considers ETS to be voice only - at least > > for now. btw - I think that is a valid assumption - at least for now. > > depends on which "ETS" you're talking about. In the military space, > current proposals suggest at least one "preferred elastic" class > similar to AF for elastic applications as well as preferential real > time services for voice and video. In the civilian space, unless > Janet-et-al tell me otherwise, the current discussion is of an > Internet counterpart for GETS, which is to say that it is about voice. > > _______________________________________________ > Ieprep mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep