RE: proposed charter

Beyond voice, nothing has been defined.=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Janet P Gunn [mailto:[email protected]]=20
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 3:10 PM
To: Fred Baker
Cc: James M. Polk; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter





My understanding (and Martin et al can correct me/clarify):

Current discussion is about voice.
Video conferencing is actively under consideration
Elastic traffic is a long term goal, but not currently being addressed
in
any detail.

Janet


Fred Baker <[email protected]> wrote on 09/27/2006 03:05:19 PM:

>
> On Sep 27, 2006, at 11:44 AM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
>
> > Just confirming that Fred considers ETS to be voice only - at least
> > for now.  btw - I think that is a valid assumption - at least for
now.
>
> depends on which "ETS" you're talking about. In the military space,
> current proposals suggest at least one "preferred elastic" class
> similar to AF for elastic applications as well as preferential real
> time services for voice and video. In the civilian space, unless
> Janet-et-al tell me otherwise, the current discussion is of an
> Internet counterpart for GETS, which is to say that it is about voice.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ieprep mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep


_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep