Re: Another issue: quoting

   While we should ban all use of obsolete 2822 grammer with non-ASCII chars, 
   we should support the full richness of the legal to generate grammer for 
   2822 with non-ASCII chars for consistancy.  The extra work is not that hard:

Oops, you're right, my bad.

I had thought that local-part had to be a dot-atom, but that's not
true.

I'm going to have to read 2822 carefully, but can anyone confirm that
roy.badami and "roy.badami" are still potentially distinct mailboxes
in 2822, even neglecting obsolete deprecated stuff?

If so, this will require great care on the part of IMAA...

   -roy