gmane.ietf.imaa

903 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

Closing this mailing list
Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:58:43 -0700
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #903
Updating my address book
27 Jun 2004 19:58:23 -0000
"Wael Nasr" <[email protected]> • #902
Re: governance vs intergovernance
Tue, 08 Jun 2004 04:29:29 +0200
"J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <[email protected]> • #901
Re: governance vs intergovernance
Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:56:51 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #900
Re: governance vs intergovernance
Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:47:35 -0700
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #899
Re: governance vs intergovernance
Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:31:16 +0200
"J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <[email protected]> • #898
Re: governance vs intergovernance
Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:51:08 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #897
governance vs intergovernance
Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:16:48 +0200
"J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <[email protected]> • #896
Re: WHY we need do "Divide the sequence into segments"
Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:36:05 +0800
"dongxiaoli" <[email protected]> • #895
Re: WHY we need do "Divide the sequence into segments"
Sat, 5 Jun 2004 23:12:00 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #894
Re: WHY we need do "Divide the sequence into segments"
Fri, 04 Jun 2004 09:01:23 -0400
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #893
WHY we need do "Divide the sequence into segments"
Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:15:50 +0800
"dongxiaoli" <[email protected]> • #892
Re: Why not use the same decode way for the LocalPart as the way for the Domain Name in the IDN
Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:33:07 +0800
"dongxiaoli" <[email protected]> • #891
Re: Why not use the same decode way for the LocalPart as the way for the Domain Name in the IDN
Sun, 18 Apr 2004 03:43:39 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #890
Re: Why not use the same decode way for the LocalPart as the way for the Domain Name in the IDN
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:27:59 -0700
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #889
Why not use the same decode way for the LocalPart as the way for the Domain Name in the IDN
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:23:28 +0800
"dongxiaoli" <[email protected]> • #888
Re: Did someone have the tools
Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:51:18 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #887
Did someone have the tools
Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:19:32 +0800
"dongxiaoli" <[email protected]> • #886
closed issue [bidiDigits-18] (was: Re: Bidi: now I'm confused)
Sun, 21 Mar 2004 11:41:30 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #885
IDN-OSS Mailing List
Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:21:03 +1100
William Tan <[email protected]> • #884
A Model for proposals for I18N of email
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:32:55 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #883
Re: Comments on draft-klensin-email-i18n-message-00.txt
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:18:21 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #882
Re: Comments on draft-klensin-email-i18n-message-00.txt
Fri, 05 Mar 2004 15:27:45 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] • #881
Re: Comments on draft-klensin-email-i18n-message-00.txt
Fri, 05 Mar 2004 14:51:51 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] • #880
Re: Comments on draft-klensin-email-i18n-message-00.txt
Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:04:57 -0500
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #879
Comments on draft-klensin-email-i18n-message-00.txt
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:24:12 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #878
Re: jabber log from Monday's IEA BOF?
Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:42:02 -0500
Tony Hansen <[email protected]> • #877
Re: jabber log from Monday's IEA BOF?
Wed, 03 Mar 2004 05:50:56 -0500
Tony Hansen <[email protected]> • #876
Re: jabber log from Monday's IEA BOF?
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 19:07:23 +0900
Yoshiro YONEYA <[email protected]> • #875
jabber log from Monday's IEA BOF?
Wed, 03 Mar 2004 03:37:59 -0500
Tony Hansen <[email protected]> • #874
IDN-OSS Alpha Plugin for IE
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:32:20 +1100
William Tan <[email protected]> • #873
jabber log of Yesterday's IEA BoF
Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:41:23 +0900
Yoshiro YONEYA <[email protected]> • #872
Re: Comments on and FWD: draft-klensin-emailaddr-i18n-02.txt
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:23:56 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #871
Re: Comments on and FWD: draft-klensin-emailaddr-i18n-02.txt
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:47:46 -0500
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #870
Re: Comments on and FWD:
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:38:32 GMT
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> • #869
Re: Comments on and FWD:
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:34:54 -0000
Charles Lindsey <[email protected]> • #868
Re: New draft, new idea
Fri, 06 Feb 2004 17:46:15 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #867
Re: New draft, new idea
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 07:34:22 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #866
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 18:39:15 -0800
Grant Baillie <[email protected]> • #865
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:28:55 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #864
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 05 Feb 2004 18:04:57 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #863
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:19:37 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #862
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:57:33 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #861
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:45:57 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #860
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 10:28:27 -0800
Grant Baillie <[email protected]> • #859
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:46:58 -0500
[email protected] • #858
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:47:18 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #857
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:41:13 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #856
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:23:03 -0800
Grant Baillie <[email protected]> • #855
Re: New draft, new idea
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:44:35 +0100
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #854