Re: New draft, new idea
[email protected] Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:46:58 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Paul Hoffman / IMC scripsit: > Not at all. The display name has no connection to the mailbox name=20 > anywhere other than in the MUA. Therefore, two people at ccil.org=20 > could say the display name for their two different mailboxes is=20 > "Jos=E9". The display is local to the MUA reading the message. Ah, I didn't understand this. Then why not handle it as a fullname comme= nt, rather than something masquerading as a mailbox name? All that would be required is some escaping convention for RFC 2822 comments. --=20 What is the sound of Perl? Is it not the John Cowan sound of a [Ww]all that people have stopped [email protected] banging their head against? --Larry http://www.ccil.org/~cowa= n