Re: Question: full-width at
John Cowan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Roy Badami scripsit: > Question: is full-width-at the only character that contains the > at-sign in its compatibility decomposition? No, there is also U+FE6B, the SMALL COMMERCIAL AT. It's fullwidth but standard size, with lots of kerning around it. U+FF20 is fullwidth and large-sized. > And I won't even ask what happens if you try and follow the at-sign > with a combining accent. I'm assuming there are no precomposed > characters of that form, so NFKC vs NFCD won't make a difference > here... There are none, fortunately. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all. There are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful. --_The Hobbit_