Need for ESMPT extension for IMAA?
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p05210325ba742ffacdca@[63.202.92.157]> |
In John's proposal for a very different idea of how to do IMAA, he said: At 8:00 PM -0500 2/14/03, John C Klensin wrote: > Loose end a.3: Because of the opacity requirement, I > believe that even IMAA would ultimately require an ESMTP > extension and negotiation to work properly. So, in some > ways this proposal and IMAA are compatible and > complementary if an IMAA ACE string is used rather than > UTF-8. I think that would be overkill unless we really > like that hammer. Could you elucidate? I cannot see how IMAA touches standard SMTP at all if we agree (as I'm pretty sure we do) that the local part is opaque. --Paul Hoffman, Director --Internet Mail Consortium