Need for ESMPT extension for IMAA?

Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.imaa
Message-ID <p05210325ba742ffacdca@[63.202.92.157]>
In John's proposal for a very different idea of how to do IMAA, he said:

At 8:00 PM -0500 2/14/03, John C Klensin wrote:
>	Loose end a.3: Because of the opacity requirement, I
>	believe that even IMAA would ultimately require an ESMTP
>	extension and negotiation to work properly.  So, in some
>	ways this proposal and IMAA are compatible and
>	complementary if an IMAA ACE string is used rather than
>	UTF-8.   I think that would be overkill unless we really
>	like that hammer.

Could you elucidate? I cannot see how IMAA touches standard SMTP at 
all if we agree (as I'm pretty sure we do) that the local part is 
opaque.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.