Re: Subaddressing
Marc Mutz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imaa |
|---|---|
| Organization | KDE |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Saturday 15 February 2003 22:23, Marc Mutz wrote:
> So the requirements to balance are
> 1. keeping complexity out of the server for the reasons stated above
> 2. keeping the concept of opaque local-parts in all it's strictness.
In the light of John's recent mail, I should add that I'm talking about
keeping or not keeping the concept of opaque local-parts /for IMAs/,
iow, whether or not to _extend_ the concept to ILPs.
I'm specifically not trying to start a discussion whether or not opaque
local-parts as currently used are a bad idea - they're not. Apologies
if my mail came across like that.
Marc
--
[Norton SystemWorks 2002] Wipe Info uses hexadecimal values to wipe
files. This provides more security than wiping with decimal values.
-- Norton SystemWorks 2002 Manual, p.160
(seen on Cryptogram 12/01)
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+Trdh3oWD+L2/6DgRAtBoAJ9dZm6z34AxPYU1dvR7yG9k09tqlgCeOueJ VVaIwlCWQxRAd/Q/gYqhegM= =XgPC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----