Re: Can we back up a bit and ask some basic questions?An alternate model

Hi James,

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Seng" <[email protected]>
> 1. Please submit this as an proper IETF I-D, thank you.

has been done, please check:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chung-imax-00.txt

> 2. There are two separate issues, 2821 & 2822. IMAA deals along 2822 (and
> probably above it) whereas your proposal deals with 2821 specifically.
> Please dont violate laying.

yup, have been addressed by a couple of ppl.
Will be updated in -01, where section 3 will be eliminated altogether.

> 3. Your proposal did not address with 2821 servers who did not response
> IMAX.

You are right.  I forgot to add it in, it would be the same as in the second
example in Section 2.2 though.  But yes, I will add it in.

> 4. Dont forget the lessons on 8BITMIME and/or the lack of it.

I was actually thinking that IMAX would encourage the support and
annoucement by server of ESMTP+8bitmime support. :-)


Edmon




>
> -James Seng
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Edmon Chung" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>; "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <[email protected]>; "Martin
> Duerst" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 4:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Can we back up a bit and ask some basic questions?An
alternate
> model
>
>
> >
> > I have just submitted the draft on IMA based on SMTP and POP extensions
to
> > the IETF.  You could also check it out at
> > http://www.dnsii.org/draft-ietf-chung-imax-00.txt
> >
> > Because I wrote it about 2.5 years ago some of the stuff might need some
> > update.  Anyway, comments and discussions would be very much
appreciated.
> > :-)
> >
> > Edmon
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Martin Duerst" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Edmon Chung" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Paul Hoffman
/
> > IMC" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:28 PM
> > Subject: Re: Can we back up a bit and ask some basic questions?An
> alternate
> > model
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Great! Please submit it as an Internet-Draft and copy this list.
> > >
> > > Regards,    Martin.
> > >
> > > At 12:32 03/02/20 -0500, Edmon Chung wrote:
> > >
> > > >I do have a draft for it actually based on ESMTP.
> > > >Should I just send it to this list or do we have a draft archive?...
or
> > > >should I send to ietf for archival?...
> > > >Edmon
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <[email protected]>
> > > >To: <[email protected]>
> > > >Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:58 AM
> > > >Subject: Re: Can we back up a bit and ask some basic questions?An
> > alternate
> > > >model
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This thread has gone towards making guesses about how IMAA-UTF8
> would
> > > > > be specified, and different people have different guesses.
> > > > >
> > > > > When there is a complete Internet Draft on IMAA-UTF8, we can
discuss
> > > > > it sensibly; until then, we can't. If John or Martin or some other
> > > > > proponent of the idea wants to make a draft, please do so. It
would
> > > > > be quite appropriate to discuss it on this mailing list. But until
> > > > > then, could we curtail the guessing?
> > > > >
> > > > > --Paul Hoffman, Director
> > > > > --Internet Mail Consortium
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>