Re: Further thoughts on preferred printable representations...
Roy Badami <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Apologies for the very delayed response. > Operating systems are all going to support direct input of Unicode > characters by number. The ISO standard method is Shift-Ctrl-222E for > character 222E. Thanks for the reference; I wasn't aware of this. > People who put hard-to-recognize characters onto their business cards > are going to add a line giving the Unicode numbers, perhaps in boxes: > > [email protected] (with a contour-integral sign) > > +----+ > postmaster@|222E|.cr.yp.to (in smaller type) > +----+ It's an interesting suggestion, and it might certainly be relevent in some contexts, but I don't see this being widely adopted for e-mail addresses. The internationalized e-mail address will clearly be chosen to be unambiguous to the target audience; if the person producing the business card cares about people outside his target audience (ie people unfamilliar with the relevant script) then most likely they will simply include an additional ASCII-only address... -roy