RE: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA)
"Jony Rosenne" <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:45:54 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <004701c39fd6$dbd2f840$f101260a@QSM4> |
There are more people in this world who don't recognize the 4 Latin letters in Tanaka than those who do. Jony > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Crispin > Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:15 AM > To: Mark Davis > Cc: Keith Moore; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; IMAP Extensions WG; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [idn] Re: FYI: BOF on Internationalized Email > Addresses (IEA) > > > > On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Mark Davis wrote: > > I'm curious: why do you think that everyone would be satisfied with > > Latin characters only, and no non-Latin characters? > > I didn't say that. I stated my belief that, for reasons of > practicality, most individuals in regions which do not use > Latin script accept the use of Latin script for multinational > exchange. > > It does not work well for an individual in Japan with surname > Tanaka to expect the overwhelming majority of non-Japanese > individuals worldwide to know his surname is written with the > Han characters for "rice paddy" and "middle", or what those > characters look like, or how to enter those characters on the > computer. > > It does, however, work for him to expect that the > overwhelming majority of individuals worldwide to know how to > deal with the 6 Latin letters that form the romanization "Tanaka". > > Nor is it very likely that this situation will change in the > future. I doubt that many individuals in the world are > literate in all the world's active scripts. Literacy in > one's native script and basic Latin script is something that > most computer users possess today. > > For domestic exchange only, that pair of Han characters are > probably alright. Within Western Europe, it's probably > alright to use Latin characters with diacriticals. > > Perhaps the main problem that needs to be decided in any IEA > effort is if it is alright to have email addresses that are > only usable in limited areas of the world; or if not, how to > represent internationalized email addresses in a usable > fashion when (not if) the email address needs to be > represented for a person and/or computer is illiterate in that script. > > A likely side issue is whether it is "good enough" to promote > Latin characters with diacriticals to the same status of > "everybody must know how to do these" that is required for ASCII. > > -- Mark -- > > http://staff.washington.edu/mrc > Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or > public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum. >