Re: IEA Bottom Line
Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> Mon, 03 Nov 2003 13:24:39 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imaa,gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Columbia University in the City of New York |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
John: Thank you for your continued rationality. I do not have a strong opinion on what the solution to this problem should look like. However, I am concerned about some related problems. Local mail parts are often derived from or are usernames. Administrators like the ability to be able to assign a single name to an end user for the purpose of user identity. It is my hope that whatever conclusion is reached will ensure that the i18n mechanism will allow this single single name to be compatible with existing naming conventions utilized with Kerberos, SASL, X.509, etc. It would I believe detrimental to everyone if the various protocols which must manipulate user identities did not have a common way of representing them. Jeffrey Altman
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 3.3 KB) - not displayed