Re: what is the real problem?
"John Cowan" <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:15:06 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Keith Moore scripsit: [much Good Stuff snipped] > 6. Users need to be able to transcribe addresses that they receive in > email, whether in message headers or in a message body, and whether or > not their software supports the extensions that enable IMAs, and > whether or not the recipient knows the language and script in which the > sender normally writes his name and email address. This is separate > from the need to reply to messages or store received addresses in an > address book. > > (Note: #6 directly implies the need to support multiple versions of a > sender address, in order to provide a recipient with an address that he > can transcribe.) This requirement strikes me as unreasonably broad: it demands not merely multiple versions, but as many multiple versions as there are scripts. I do not think that senders need to provide email addresses in any scripts except those used to write languages they know, plus Basic Latin (ASCII). -- John Cowan [email protected] www.reutershealth.com ccil.org/~cowan Dievas dave dantis; Dievas duos duonos --Lithuanian proverb Deus dedit dentes; deus dabit panem --Latin version thereof Deity donated dentition; deity'll donate doughnuts --English version by Muke Tever God gave gums; God'll give granary --Version by Mat McVeagh