Re: quick & dirty alternate addresses
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> Mon, 01 Dec 2003 09:41:53 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4.2.0.58.J.20031201093156.0576dfc8@localhost> |
At 08:05 03/12/01 +0000, Adam M. Costello wrote: >While we're considering new header fields and new address-mapping >servers to deal with the problem of having alternate addresses, we ought >to consider how far we could get with what we already have. Hello Adam, I won't comment on the details of your proposal. But I think it's very good to explore the design space around alternate addresses. While there are important interactions with Paul's UTF-8 header proposal, both technically as well as in terms of deployment, what exact scheme we pick is in many ways just a detail. Up to now, we have the following alternate address schemes (please tell me if I missed some): - Keith's alternate address lookup servers - Adam's alternate addresses in encoded words - Paul's Address-map: header - Calculated alternates using some ACE For Paul's draft, that suggests to split out the method of getting to alternate addresses at least into a separate chapter (maybe later even into a separate draft), so that it's easy to replace without having to rewrite the whole document. Regards, Martin.