Re: quick & dirty alternate addresses
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Dec 2003 01:28:12 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > MUAs already allow people to set the display-names for themselves > > and for recipients. > > Sure. But to use them as addresses, I have to write real parsing > code. Why would a software agent want to use one of the alternate addresses? It can just use the real angle-addr (as it always has), and treat the display-name as an opaque string to display to the user (as it always has). It's only humans who might have trouble using the angle-addr (because it might be hard to remember), and thus it's only humans who need to be able to see the addresses in the display-name, so that if they ever need to recall an address, they'll have an easier one to remember. One of the selling points of the display-name approach was that it would work in existing MUAs. But that was assuming that they wouldn't choke on long display-names, which unfortunately seems not to be the case. AMC