Re: quick & dirty alternate addresses
Keith Moore <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:42:45 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> Nope, my MUA has never treated the display-name as an opaque >> string. It decodes it and, upon reply, copies the whole address >> (display name and angle-addr) directly into the "To:" field where it >> expects to be able to be able to re-encode it for sending. But when >> the MUA tries to re-encode the address, it finds these angle-bracketed >> things that it thinks are illegal addresses and chokes. > > How is this anything but a software bug? it's a very common bug. it means the installed base will be less tolerant of the change, because those running buggy software will get surprising results when they try to reply to messages.