RE: 10646 & Unicode
"Jony Rosenne" <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:45:29 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000d01c3d429$1222bd00$0401c80a@QSM4> |
This is the most important difference, and it relegates ISO standards to secondary importance vis-=E0-vis industry standards, such as Unicode and = many others, that are freely available. ISO should be aware of this, because it was discussed many times, but the= y do not do anything about it.=20 Jony > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected]=20 > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam M. Costello > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 3:15 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: 10646 & Unicode .. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > I haven't seen 10646 (it's too expensive),=20 ... > AMC >=20