RE: 10646 & Unicode

"Jony Rosenne" <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:45:29 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.imaa
Message-ID <000d01c3d429$1222bd00$0401c80a@QSM4>
This is the most important difference, and it relegates ISO standards to
secondary importance vis-=E0-vis industry standards, such as Unicode and =
many
others, that are freely available.

ISO should be aware of this, because it was discussed many times, but the=
y
do not do anything about it.=20

Jony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]=20
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam M. Costello
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 3:15 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: 10646 & Unicode

..



>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> I haven't seen 10646 (it's too expensive),=20
...


> AMC
>=20