Re: Agenda for Seoul BOF?
John C Klensin <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:00:47 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Paul, It seems reasonable, but see notes below... --On Thursday, 22 January, 2004 14:42 -0800 "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Greetings again. Things have been quiet (too quiet!) lately. > I'm assuming that people still are interested, and that maybe > another BOF will kick people into action, like the last time. > > Here is a proposed agenda; does it seem reasonable for > discussion? > > > Proposed agenda: > > Overview of what has happened at the last BOF and the mailing > list (10 minutes) > > Current proposals (15 minutes each): > ACE on the LHS always > UTF-8 on the LHS, protected by ESMTP > UTF-8 in all headers, protected by ESMTP > Address mapping in the MUA FWIW, draft-klensin-emailaddr-i18n-02.txt (implicitly) and draft-klensin-emailaddr-i18n-02.txt (to be posted RSN) are "UTF-8 on both the LHS and RHS" (e.g., whole address), and, now "UTF-8 in all headers, all protected by ESMTP". I think that case is not covered (quite) above. > Where to go next (30 minutes) > > Interest in MailNG? (rest of time) You should think about whether draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt (of which you have seen a preliminary version) ought to be discussed under "MailNG" or in some other context, independent of this BOF. I am sending it off this evening for I-D posting, so others should be able to see (and retch at) it soon. Also, for anyone planning to schedule this, if it would be useful to have me there, it needs to be Monday or Tuesday, or maybe first thing Wednesday, only. After that, I'm on my way to Rome for the other half of my IETF life. regards, john