Re: Open Issue: Stored strings vs. queries.

Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.imaa
Message-ID <p05210306ba71b87feb73@[63.202.92.157]>
At 7:50 PM +0100 2/13/03, Marc Mutz wrote:
>One might very well say that a mail header is a request (in that the
>user enters it and the SMTP server for the given domain needs to look
>it up to return success or failure), so that it's slots would fall into
>the "query" category. And naturally, one would like to have the content
>of the message headers and that of the smtp commands be subject to the
>same rules, now that 282{1,2} agree on the mailbox definition.
>
>However, the POV that the message is stored and it's addresses will be
>subject to queries (e.g. by user filtering or searching) isn't way off,
>too. There's also the argument that what the server looks up is the
>argument given to SMTP's RCPT TO command, not what's in the header
>fields.

This doesn't match the general definition of queries and stored in 
Stringprep. I cannot see how a header would be considered a query. It 
isn't asking for anything, it is a part of the message.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.