Re: [IMAP] APPEND Command Usage
Bron Gondwana <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1418382222.2991667.202054141.5AC5F4F5@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014, at 09:24 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > All mailbox attributes are typically checked for equality, so this this > a departure from this principle. (I know we started to violate this rule > in CAPABILITY response) > So personally, I prefer if we add a new STATUS item for APPEND limit. > Then we can use STATUS-in-LIST bridge > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5819) to return this information. > > As clients that want to obey APPENDLIMIT would need to be modified > anyway, they might as well be modified to support RFC 5819 syntax. > > But otherwise I am Ok with being able to return this information in LIST. Adding something in STATUS that doesn't also exist in the SELECT response seems somewhat weird to me. (speaking of STATUS-IN-LIST, I appear to have just pushed back my non-standard MYRIGHTS-IN-LIST extension to Cyrus master. It makes sense - while you're grabbing the status, you also want to grab permissions for the purpose of UI display. We should write that up too) Bron. -- Bron Gondwana [email protected] _______________________________________________ imapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext