Re: [IMAP] APPEND Command Usage

On 12/12/2014 11:03, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014, at 09:24 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> All mailbox attributes are typically checked for equality, so this this
>> a departure from this principle. (I know we started to violate this rule
>> in CAPABILITY response)
>> So personally, I prefer if we add a new STATUS item for APPEND limit.
>> Then we can use STATUS-in-LIST bridge
>> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5819) to return this information.
>>
>> As clients that want to obey APPENDLIMIT would need to be modified
>> anyway, they might as well be modified to support RFC 5819 syntax.
>>
>> But otherwise I am Ok with being able to return this information in LIST.
> Adding something in STATUS that doesn't also exist in the SELECT response
> seems somewhat weird to me.
I think we already agreed that APPENDLIMIT response code will be 
returned on SELECT?
> (speaking of STATUS-IN-LIST, I appear to have just pushed back my non-standard
> MYRIGHTS-IN-LIST extension to Cyrus master.  It makes sense - while you're
> grabbing the status, you also want to grab permissions for the purpose of UI display.
> We should write that up too)
Sounds good. I would be happy to implement both client side and server side.

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext