Re: AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06
Barry Leiba <[email protected]> Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:14:31 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAC4RtVD641FWp_BpSdjRQJsMsX4-1j3pc3HuttzNj8=37WusnA@mail.gmail.com> |
>> Why do we think there's anything wrong with using, say, the word >> "NONE" (either case-insensitive or case-sensitive; I don't care)? >> What's wrong with this?: >> >> C: t1 STATUS INBOX (APPENDLIMIT) >> S: * STATUS INBOX (APPENDLIMIT NONE) >> S: t1 OK STATUS completed > > If you're going to do that, why not make it (APPENDLIMIT NIL), > which already has exactly the meaning that we want? Yes, I'd forgotten about the existing token "NIL". I like that approach. Barry _______________________________________________ imapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext