Re: AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06

"Adrien de Croy" <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Dec 2015 03:39:02 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.imapext
Message-ID <emcf7f771e-a84b-4df3-b9ff-06dd5417a655@bodybag>

------ Original Message ------
From: "Barry Leiba" <[email protected]>
To: "Bron Gondwana" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: 17/12/2015 9:14:31 a.m.
Subject: Re: [imapext] AD review of 
draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06

>>>  Why do we think there's anything wrong with using, say, the word
>>>  "NONE" (either case-insensitive or case-sensitive; I don't care)?
>>>  What's wrong with this?:
>>>
>>>  C: t1 STATUS INBOX (APPENDLIMIT)
>>>  S: * STATUS INBOX (APPENDLIMIT NONE)
>>>  S: t1 OK STATUS completed
>>
>>  If you're going to do that, why not make it (APPENDLIMIT NIL),
>>  which already has exactly the meaning that we want?
>
>Yes, I'd forgotten about the existing token "NIL".  I like that 
>approach.
+1

Definitely not a fan of overloading the meaning of magic numbers


>
>Barry
>
>_______________________________________________
>imapext mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext