Re: AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06
"Adrien de Croy" <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Dec 2015 03:39:02 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <emcf7f771e-a84b-4df3-b9ff-06dd5417a655@bodybag> |
------ Original Message ------ From: "Barry Leiba" <[email protected]> To: "Bron Gondwana" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: 17/12/2015 9:14:31 a.m. Subject: Re: [imapext] AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 >>> Why do we think there's anything wrong with using, say, the word >>> "NONE" (either case-insensitive or case-sensitive; I don't care)? >>> What's wrong with this?: >>> >>> C: t1 STATUS INBOX (APPENDLIMIT) >>> S: * STATUS INBOX (APPENDLIMIT NONE) >>> S: t1 OK STATUS completed >> >> If you're going to do that, why not make it (APPENDLIMIT NIL), >> which already has exactly the meaning that we want? > >Yes, I'd forgotten about the existing token "NIL". I like that >approach. +1 Definitely not a fan of overloading the meaning of magic numbers > >Barry > >_______________________________________________ >imapext mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext _______________________________________________ imapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext