Re: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-08: (with COMMENT)

S Moonesamy <[email protected]> Thu, 07 Jan 2016 08:14:51 -0800

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.imapext
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Hi Jay,
At 08:04 07-01-2016, Jayantheesh S B wrote:
>Yes, both text refers to the same examples in Section 2.

Thanks for confirming that.

Why is there a RFC 2119 "SHOULD" in the first sentence of the last 
paragraph of Section 2?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy 

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext