Re: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-08: (with COMMENT)

Dear SM,

IMAP client implementing this extension, should be capable to parse both Mailbox-specific and Global APPENDLIMIT response.

IMAP client ignoring one format may result in non-compliance to this extension. To stress that point we have added RFC 2119 "SHOULD" in that sentence.  

Regards,
Jay
-----Original Message-----
From: S Moonesamy [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 11:15 AM
To: Jayantheesh S B; Narendra Singh Bisht
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-08: (with COMMENT)

Hi Jay,
At 08:04 07-01-2016, Jayantheesh S B wrote:
>Yes, both text refers to the same examples in Section 2.

Thanks for confirming that.

Why is there a RFC 2119 "SHOULD" in the first sentence of the last paragraph of Section 2?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy 

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext