Re: Proposed IMPP agenda

Mark,

I regret to say I cannot be at Atlanta next week. 

But, I believe that there is no important remaining issues for the 
PIDF draft itself.  The updates in the -06 revision of PIDF draft are 
clarifications and wordsmithing, and the only technical change is 
the usage of "mustUnderstand" attribute in extension elements.  

I hope it is fully stable. 


-- Hiroyasu Sugano


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Day" <[email protected]>
To: <"[email protected]"@cisco.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 5:18 AM
Subject: Proposed IMPP agenda


> Below is the agenda I have sent in to the IETF secretariat. It can be
> tweaked until Wednesday noon ET.
> 
> Of course, it can also be bashed in real-time at the start of the meeting.
> 
> --Mark
> 
> Instant Message and Presence Protocol WG (impp)
> 
> Monday, November 18 at 1930-2200
> 
> Chairs:
> Mark Day <[email protected]>
> Derek Atkins <[email protected]>
> 
> Agenda:
> 
> Summary of status of all current group drafts (5 min)
> MSGFMT: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-msgfmt-07
> PIDF: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-06
> PRES: draft-ietf-impp-pres-00
> IM: draft-ietf-impp-im-00
> SRV: draft-ietf-impp-srv-00
> 
> Overview of restructuring of single CPIM draft into three new drafts (5 min)
> 
> Summary of non-security-related open issues on PRES, IM, and SRV (5 min)
> 
> Discussion (20 min)
> 
> Summary of non-security-related open issues on PIDF (5 min)
> 
> Discussion (20 min)
> 
> Summary of security-related open issues in all group drafts (10 min)
> 
> Discussion (80 min)
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]
> 
> 
> 



  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]