Re: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> Fri, 15 Nov 2002 21:02:37 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.impp |
|---|---|
| Organization | TribalWise |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Adam, Friday, November 15, 2002, 5:31:18 PM, you wrote: Adam> "For example, one strategy might transmit presence information as Adam> key/value pairs, another might use a compact binary representation, Adam> and a third might use nested containers. ... Adam> The "clear relation between the abstract syntax... and how it is Adam> faithfully encoded" sure sounds like a lossless syntactic Adam> transformation to me. if one side of the gateway uses key/value and the other side uses compact binary, then how does end-to-end security work? d/ -- Dave Crocker <mailto:[email protected]> TribalWise <http://www.tribalwise.com> t +1.408.246.8253; f +1.408.850.1850 [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]