Re: NAPTR and CPIM
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> Sat, 16 Nov 2002 00:58:24 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.impp |
|---|---|
| Organization | dynamicsoft |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > In the current CPIM draft, it mentions that > > "To process an IM URI, a lookup is performed for SRVs for the target > domain and a desired IM transfer protocol" > > Should the "desired" transfer protocol be a choice of the terminating > side? If so, should NAPRT be used? We went through a long, grueling discussion on NAPTR or not, quite some time back. In the end, we decided we really didnt need most of what it could provide, and so we settled on the current algorithm. I am sure the details are somewhere in the archives. That algorithm has the recipient place records for each IM transport they support. The sender then selects amongst those which are available. -Jonathan R. -- Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Ave. Chief Scientist First Floor dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936 [email protected] FAX: (973) 952-5050 http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000 http://www.dynamicsoft.com [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]