Chairs say rough consensus: MSGFMT and Gatewaying

[Resent since first sending seems not to have gone out on the list, roughly
12 hours later. --Mark]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Day [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 12:46 PM
> To: "[email protected]"
> Subject: Chairs say rough consensus: MSGFMT and Gatewaying
>
>
> I checked in with my co-chair Derek this morning. We agree that
> it's clear from the threads over recent days that while we do not
> have unanimity, we do have rough consensus on the following points:
>
> 1) We won't reopen the MSGFMT discussion.
>
> 2) CPIM and IMPP in general are concerned only with gatewaying or
> other forms of interoperation among IM/P systems that have chosen
> to conform to 2778/2779.
>
> I think that good points have been made on both sides and I
> appreciate the thought and energy that have gone into the
> discussion. But now we need to move on.
>
> In particular, we badly need to use Monday's meeting in Atlanta
> to identify and discuss any remaining issues that are blocking
> completion and submission of our current drafts.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Mark
>
>
>
>




  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]