Chairs say rough consensus: MSGFMT and Gatewaying

I checked in with my co-chair Derek this morning. We agree that it's clear
from the threads over recent days that while we do not have unanimity, we do
have rough consensus on the following points:

1) We won't reopen the MSGFMT discussion.

2) CPIM and IMPP in general are concerned only with gatewaying or other
forms of interoperation among IM/P systems that have chosen to conform to
2778/2779.

I think that good points have been made on both sides and I appreciate the
thought and energy that have gone into the discussion. But now we need to
move on.

In particular, we badly need to use Monday's meeting in Atlanta to identify
and discuss any remaining issues that are blocking completion and submission
of our current drafts.

Thanks,

--Mark







  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]