Re: Attempt to summarize various threads

Hi, all. 

Sorry for my delayed response. 
I have managed my time to revise the PIDF draft. 

> 3. Is it OK for there to be zero tuples in PIDF?  Yes, but we need to add
> text to the spec discouraging any attempt to use e.g. <note> as a
> non-interoperable substitute for status.

In addition to some changes to allow zero tuples (including Schema Definition
and DTD),  I have inserted a simple paragraph as follows after the first paragraph 
of Section 4.1.6 (The <note> element); 

   Note that, wherever it appears, a <note> element SHOULD NOT be used,
   and interpreted, as a non-interoperable substitute for status of its
   parent element.


Does it work? 


-- Hiroyasu Sugano





  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]