Re: Attempt to summarize various threads

This is fine by me.

-Jonathan R.

Hiroyasu Sugano wrote:
> Hi, all. 
> 
> Sorry for my delayed response. 
> I have managed my time to revise the PIDF draft. 
> 
> 
>>3. Is it OK for there to be zero tuples in PIDF?  Yes, but we need to add
>>text to the spec discouraging any attempt to use e.g. <note> as a
>>non-interoperable substitute for status.
> 
> 
> In addition to some changes to allow zero tuples (including Schema Definition
> and DTD),  I have inserted a simple paragraph as follows after the first paragraph 
> of Section 4.1.6 (The <note> element); 
> 
>    Note that, wherever it appears, a <note> element SHOULD NOT be used,
>    and interpreted, as a non-interoperable substitute for status of its
>    parent element.
> 
> 
> Does it work? 
> 
> 
> -- Hiroyasu Sugano
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]
> 
> 

-- 
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                72 Eagle Rock Ave.
Chief Scientist                             First Floor
dynamicsoft                                 East Hanover, NJ 07936
[email protected]                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net                      PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com




  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]