Re: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:im

Graham Klyne <[email protected]> Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:02:36 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.impp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 16:40 20/11/03 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>The PIDF I-D includes the 'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:im' namespace in
>several examples. I have been unable to locate documentation for this
>namespace. Am I missing something obvious?

Following:
   http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces
   http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2648.txt
the trail seems to run dry...  not most helpful :-/

I'm not sure how you're supposed to know this, but
   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry-05.txt
defines the urn:ietf:params:xml:ns sub-namespace, and this should be cited 
in the final PIDF draft.  The registration templates should be within the 
same (PIDF) draft, I think.  The called-for registry itself doesn't seem to 
exist yet, which I guess is unsurprising because the registry draft hasn't 
yet been published as RFC, though it is in the queue, according to:
   https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=search_list&search_job_owner=0&search_group_acronym=&search_status_id=&search_cur_state=&sub_state_id=6&search_filename=draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry&search_rfcnumber=&search_area_acronym=&search_button=SEARCH

(Or, if that URI is too much to handle, go to
   https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi
and search for filename:
   draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry
)

#g
--

At 16:40 20/11/03 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>The PIDF I-D includes the 'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:im' namespace in
>several examples. I have been unable to locate documentation for this
>namespace. Am I missing something obvious?
>
>Thanks!
>
>Peter
>
>--
>Peter Saint-Andre
>Jabber Software Foundation
>http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.php
>
>
>
>
>   [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]

------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact




  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]