AD review: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docsisevent-mib-04.txt
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipcdn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15503C79F10@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
Not a final review, just a question first that came up
when I did a quick initial browse:
I do not understand:
MODULE -- docsDevNotif
--mandatory groups
GROUP docsDevCmNotifControlGroup
DESCRIPTION
"Mandatory in CM."
GROUP docsDevCmNotificationGroup
DESCRIPTION
"Mandatory in CM."
::= { docsDevNotifCompliances 1 }
Why would you not specify instead:
docsDevCmNotifCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The compliance statement for CM Notifications and Control"
MODULE --docsDevNotif
MANDATORY-GROUPS {
docsDevCmNotifControlGroup,
docsDevCmNotificationGroup
}
After all, it is the compliance for CM, and for a CM, both groups
are mandatory. So using my alternate method makes that a spec
that is machine readable.
Same for the Cmts compliance of course.
Bert