RE: AD review: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docsisevent-mib-04.txt

Burt,

OK with me.  I'll get the update into the next revision.

Thanks, greg

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 6:58 AM
To: Ipcdn (E-mail)
Subject: [ipcdn] AD review: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docsisevent-mib-04.txt


Not a final review, just a question first that came up
when I did a quick initial browse:

I do not understand:

       MODULE -- docsDevNotif
       --mandatory groups

           GROUP docsDevCmNotifControlGroup
           DESCRIPTION
               "Mandatory in CM."
  
           GROUP docsDevCmNotificationGroup
           DESCRIPTION
               "Mandatory in CM."

       ::= { docsDevNotifCompliances 1 }

Why would you not specify instead:

   docsDevCmNotifCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
       STATUS current
       DESCRIPTION
       "The compliance statement for CM Notifications and Control"

       MODULE --docsDevNotif
         MANDATORY-GROUPS {
             docsDevCmNotifControlGroup,
             docsDevCmNotificationGroup
         }

After all, it is the compliance for CM, and for a CM, both groups are mandatory. So using my alternate method makes that a spec that is machine readable.

Same for the Cmts compliance of course.

Bert

_______________________________________________
IPCDN mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn