RE: RE: V2 Changes for next RFI v2 MIB (draft 10) - Clarification

Hi Minnie, 
 
that's a good summary, 
 
I will make docsIfCmtsModStorageType read-only, based in all your arguments
 
Thanks
 
Eduardo

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Minnie Lu [mailto:[email protected]] 
	Sent: Fri 4/16/2004 6:27 PM 
	To: Eduardo Cardona; Randy Presuhn 
	Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; DOCSIS OSS Majordomo List 
	Subject: RE: [ipcdn] RE: V2 Changes for next RFI v2 MIB (draft 10) - Clarification
	
	

	Hi, Eduardo and  Randy,
	
	"When an agent ages out a row that hasn't gone active
	within the prescribed time, I believe it doesn't matter what the
	StorageType was set to."
	
	  Great !  It is very useful info. Thanks a lot !
	
	  So please allow me to summary the requirement as I understand so far.
	
	   For docsIfCmtsModulationTable,
	   1. active rows MUST be persistent across CMTS reload.
	   2. non-active row will not be persistent (implied by rowStatus and no
	matter what value is in the storageType).
	   3. System default rows MAY be read-only by setting the storageType value
	to  permanent(4), or readOnly(5) when system create the default rows.
	
	    I think it is ok to have docsIfCmtsModStorageType as read-only
	object.:-)   In this way, it can be sure that the active row's storageType
	will not be changed to volatile(2) and lost after reboot. This is important
	especially for those in-used rows.
	
	   If I miss anything, please correct me.
	
	   Thanks  a lot !
	   Minnie
	
	
	
	At 04:44 PM 4/16/2004 -0600, Eduardo Cardona wrote:
	>Exactly that's the last Minnies, concern, if explicitely or not even
	>needed.
	>Thanks
	>Eduardo
	>
	>-----Original Message-----
	>From: Randy Presuhn [mailto:[email protected]]
	>Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 4:11 PM
	>To: [email protected]
	>Subject: Re: [ipcdn] RE: V2 Changes for next RFI v2 MIB (draft 10) -
	>Clarification
	>
	>
	>Hi -
	>
	> > From: "Eduardo Cardona" <[email protected]>
	> > To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
	> > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 2:49 PM
	> > Subject: RE: [ipcdn] RE: V2 Changes for next RFI v2 MIB (draft 10) -
	> > Clarification
	>...
	> > Minnie's question if if need to be specify that rowstatus != active,
	> > StorageType = nonVolatile the entry is deleted or if the RowStatus
	> > aging covers that.
	>...
	>
	>Ah.  Sorry about the confusion.
	>When an agent ages out a row that hasn't gone active
	>within the prescribed time, I believe it doesn't matter what the
	>StorageType was set to.  Of course, it doesn't hurt to be explicit.
	>
	>Randy
	>
	>
	>
	>_______________________________________________
	>IPCDN mailing list
	>[email protected]
	>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn
	>
	>
	>_______________________________________________
	>IPCDN mailing list
	>[email protected]
	>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn