RE: RE: V2 Changes for next RFI v2 MIB (draft 10) - Clarification

Hi, Eduardo,

Thanks a lot !
Minnie

At 08:18 AM 4/18/2004 -0600, Eduardo Cardona wrote:
>Hi Minnie,
>
>that's a good summary,
>
>I will make docsIfCmtsModStorageType read-only, based in all your arguments
>
>Thanks
>
>Eduardo
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Minnie Lu [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Fri 4/16/2004 6:27 PM
>To: Eduardo Cardona; Randy Presuhn
>Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; DOCSIS OSS Majordomo List
>Subject: RE: [ipcdn] RE: V2 Changes for next RFI v2 MIB (draft 10) - 
>Clarification
>
>Hi, Eduardo and  Randy,
>
>"When an agent ages out a row that hasn't gone active
>within the prescribed time, I believe it doesn't matter what the
>StorageType was set to."
>
>   Great !  It is very useful info. Thanks a lot !
>
>   So please allow me to summary the requirement as I understand so far.
>
>    For docsIfCmtsModulationTable,
>    1. active rows MUST be persistent across CMTS reload.
>    2. non-active row will not be persistent (implied by rowStatus and no
>matter what value is in the storageType).
>    3. System default rows MAY be read-only by setting the storageType value
>to  permanent(4), or readOnly(5) when system create the default rows.
>
>     I think it is ok to have docsIfCmtsModStorageType as read-only
>object.:-)   In this way, it can be sure that the active row's storageType
>will not be changed to volatile(2) and lost after reboot. This is important
>especially for those in-used rows.
>
>    If I miss anything, please correct me.
>
>    Thanks  a lot !
>    Minnie
>
>
>
>
>
>At 04:44 PM 4/16/2004 -0600, Eduardo Cardona wrote:
> >Exactly that's the last Minnies, concern, if explicitely or not even
> >needed.
> >Thanks
> >Eduardo
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Randy Presuhn 
> [<mailto:[email protected]>mailto:[email protected]]
> >Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 4:11 PM
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: [ipcdn] RE: V2 Changes for next RFI v2 MIB (draft 10) -
> >Clarification
> >
> >
> >Hi -
> >
> > > From: "Eduardo Cardona" <[email protected]>
> > > To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 2:49 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [ipcdn] RE: V2 Changes for next RFI v2 MIB (draft 10) -
> > > Clarification
> >...
> > > Minnie's question if if need to be specify that rowstatus != active,
> > > StorageType = nonVolatile the entry is deleted or if the RowStatus
> > > aging covers that.
> >...
> >
> >Ah.  Sorry about the confusion.
> >When an agent ages out a row that hasn't gone active
> >within the prescribed time, I believe it doesn't matter what the
> >StorageType was set to.  Of course, it doesn't hurt to be explicit.
> >
> >Randy
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >IPCDN mailing list
> >[email protected]
> ><https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn>https://www1.ietf.org/mailm 
> an/listinfo/ipcdn
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >IPCDN mailing list
> >[email protected]
> ><https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn>https://www1.ietf.org/mailm 
> an/listinfo/ipcdn
>