Re: [IPFIX] Export of long lived flow information
Andrew Feren <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CCAF4E37.114EE%[email protected]> |
+1 I have tripped over that wording a few times in the past. The change from Flow to Flow Record is an improvement. -Andrew On 10/25/12 6:56 PM, "Paul Aitken" <[email protected]> wrote: >Gerhard, > >If everyone's happy with this clarification, then we should ask IANA to >update the descriptions in the IPFIX registry. > >P. > > >On 25/10/12 19:26, Gerhard Muenz wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> It seems that some Information Element descriptions need >> clarification. For example, I think that the description of the >> Information Elements flowStart* and flowEnd* should be clarified: >> >> OLD: >> The absolute timestamp of the first|last packet of this Flow. >> NEW: >> The absolute timestamp of the first|last packet accounted in this Flow >> Record. > >_______________________________________________ >IPFIX mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix